Earlier this week, writing about Tirzah Garwood, I referred to landscapes in art that appear uncanny because they contain outsize plants or objects (I might also have mentioned Paul Nash's Event on the Downs - see my earlier post 'Ideas for Sculpture in a Setting'). Here is another example, a giant mushroom that can be seen in the fascinating Royal Academy exhibition Astonishing Things: The Drawings of Victor Hugo. In the catalogue Rose Thompson says that 'very little is known about his depiction of a poisonous mushroom. In a seemingly post-apocalyptic landscape, the drawing reveals a hidden secret: a ghostly human face trapped within the mushroom's stem.' Most of Hugo's paintings involve pen, brown ink and wash - see for example the The Octopus I included here back in 2012 - but many, like Mushroom - incorporate additional media. Here he has added charcoal, crayon and green, red and white gouache.*
Hugo made topographical sketches in France, northern Spain, Luxembourg and Germany, but he didn't travel much compared to contemporaries who explored the Mediterranean and near East. Many of the landscapes in this exhibition are imaginary, with mysterious buildings half submerged in mist or doubled as reflections in water. He incorporated random and accidental effects in a manner that can be likened to the blot landscapes advocated in the eighteenth century by Alexander Cozens. He can also be seen as a proto-surrealist, interested in the unconscious and experimenting with ways to abandon control in his drawing processes. A couple of miniature landscape paintings in the exhibition particularly struck me for their Romantic atmosphere. Undergrowth c. 1847 is 7.3 x 4.5cm seems to show some trees or grass - it is hard to tell at this scale. The Abandoned Park is even smaller, just 4.4 by 3.5cm - about the size of a stamp. It looks like a tiny experiment but Hugo had it engraved and it was published in a magazine, L'Artiste in 1855. Hugo also tried out new approaches in his paintings of castles, e.g. making stencils to create either positive or negative silhouettes that he could then paint over. The Guardian website has a splendid gallery of these 'burg' pictures which gives a good indication of his range of approaches.