Peter Paul Rubens, Philemon and Baucis, c1630
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Claude Lorraine, Landscape with Acis and Galatea, 1657
Source: Wikimedia Commons
According to Kenneth Clark, 'no great painter ever lived so completely within his resources as Claude. Unlike such prodigals as Rubens, his pictures always suggest a tactful and far-sighted economy.' In Landscape into Art, Clark praises the earlier writing on Claude of Hazlitt and of Roger Fry, whose essay on the artist appeared in the Burlington Magazine in 1907. Fry also praised Claude (rather faintly), whilst comparing him with more vital, colourful artists and writers. For example, he says that 'Robert Bridges, in his essay on Keats, very aptly describes for literature the kind of beauty which we find in Shakespeare : "the power of concentrating all the far-reaching resources of language on one point, so that a single and apparently effortless expression rejoices the aesthetic imagination at the moment when it is most expectant and exacting." That, ceteris paribus, applies admirably to certain kinds of design. It corresponds to the nervous touch of a Pollajuolo or a Rembrandt. But Claude's line is almost nerveless and dull. Even when it is most rapid and free it never surprises us by any intimate revelation of character, any summary indications of the central truth. But it has a certain inexpressive beauty of its own. It is never elegant, never florid, and, above all, never has any ostentation of cleverness.'
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated because even with these filters spam is more common than non-spam. Your comment therefore won't appear immediately. Sorry for the inconvenience - genuine comments are really welcome.